Platform · Measure · Vantage

What your AI investment returns.

Vantage is the leadership view of Journi DevOS. The value AI actually returns, the delivery it moves, and the sessions worth a look — rolled up across every team, measured against your own baseline, in your own numbers.

AI performance

The value, not just the spend.

Usage dashboards show what you spent. Vantage shows what you got for it: every saving priced against a no-DevOS baseline and rolled up across teams — net value, percentage saved, throughput and adoption, with the sessions worth a look flagged in place.

Vantage — AI performance · cross-team
Vantage AI-performance board — net value, spend, sessions, active developers and adoption, with a value-realized panel and a needs-attention alert list
Value & savings

What DevOS returns

Net value and percentage saved each month, per team — priced against your baseline, not estimated.

Throughput & adoption

How much it's used

Sessions, active developers and the share of tool calls on the DevOS layer — the output that follows.

Needs attention

The sessions worth a look

Deterministic rules surface outlier cost, degraded components and off-allowlist use — each with the exact figure.

Delivery

Prove what AI actually delivers.

Vantage joins your delivery data to its own record of which changes were AI-assisted — so you can see, in your own numbers, what adoption is doing to lead time, deployment frequency and change-failure rate.

Seats, not outcomes

Activity isn't delivery

Knowing how much AI is used says nothing about whether it shipped anything faster, or introduced more failures.

No AI-vs-human view

Everything's blended

Standard DORA dashboards can't separate the work an agent touched from the work it didn't — so the effect of AI is invisible.

No safety signal

Speed without safety

Going faster only helps if change-failure and restore times hold. Without that, "more AI" is a risk nobody is watching.

What it measures

The delivery metrics leaders actually track.

The DORA four, plus the flow metrics teams live by — read against your AI-assisted share over time.

Lead time to merge

First commit to merge, split into authoring and review time.

AI-assisted split

Deployment frequency

How often your changes reach production.

Change-failure rate

The share of changes that cause a problem — confirmed, with an estimated band kept separate.

Time to restore

How long issues stay open, from your tracker or incident source.

Backlog cycle time

How long work items take to go from started to done.

AI-assisted share

The share of changes an agent touched, tracked over time.

The difference

Split by how much of the work was AI-assisted.

Every change is matched to your Journi DevOS record on its commit SHA, so lead time and review can be read for AI-assisted work separately from the rest. As your AI-assisted share rises, you watch what delivery does — measured against your own baseline, in your own data.

See what AI changed

Read lead time and review for AI-assisted work on its own, next to everything else — so the effect of adoption shows up instead of vanishing into an average.

Measured on your own code

Every metric is set against your own history, on your own commits — numbers you can stand behind, not a vendor's benchmark.

Honest by design

Reported for teams, not individuals, with confirmed problems kept clearly apart from estimates — no single hero number doing the talking.

See it

The Delivery lens.

Your AI-assisted share over time, with the delivery metrics moving beside it — trend-first, period over period.

Vantage — Delivery · trailing 12 months
Vantage delivery board — DORA tiles and lead-time trend with AI-assisted segmentation, scoped to a demo workspace
Behavioural observability

Every session, analysed for waste and risk.

Alongside the boards, deterministic rules read every session as soon as it finishes and surface the ones worth a look — an outlier-cost session, spend piling on one developer, savings below target, a session lost to errors, a degraded component. Each is flagged with the exact figure. Nothing to set up.

Needs attention · Session friction
High-friction session in Web App16 of 40 tool calls (40%) were errored or exact repeats · 3 commands failed.
Who it's for

The number for the board — and the loop that keeps it honest.

Engineering leaders & CTOs

Bring the evidence to the board

Value, adoption and delivery outcomes in one view, split by AI-assisted work — the evidence to back an AI investment, or to steer it.

Developers

Confirm the links

A quick check in Hub: confirm which work item or bug a change belongs to. It takes seconds, and keeps the numbers accurate.

Connectors

Azure DevOps is live today. GitHub, GitLab and Jira connectors are in build — and value & adoption metrics work from your first pilot with no connector at all, straight from the Journi DevOS ledger.

Free 3-month pilot

Put a number on what AI returns.

Run a free pilot on your own code and watch value, delivery and adoption — split by AI-assisted work, measured against your own baseline, before any commitment.